Legal Opinion
Nall v. Board of Bar Examiners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1982No. 13761PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
New Mexico’s Board of Bar Examiners (Board) recommended that Durlene Wilson Nall (Nall) not be admitted to the Bar of New Mexico. Under New Mexico’s Rules Governing Bar Examiners, Bar Examinations and Admission to the Bar, Rule 8(b)(3), N.M.S.A.1978 (Repl.Pamp.1981), the Board found that Nall failed to establish that she was a person of good moral character. We accept the Board’s recommendation.
Nall took the 1979 February New Mexico bar examination and passed. Nall’s character and fitness for admission were called into question because of information contained in her application about…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Alice Durlene Nall, Mahlon E. Faust, and Robert Hise SportsmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Siegel v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Greene v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Petition for Admission to the Minnesota State Bar Ex Rel. HaukeboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- In Re BelsherWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- In re OppenheimNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- In re the Reinstatement of AyalaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.