Legal Opinion
In re Oppenheim
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2007No. 29,655PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} Petitioner Elliot Oppenheim (“Oppenheim”) petitions this Court to review the State Board of Bar Examiners’ (“the Board”) denial of his application for admission to the New Mexico Bar (“the Bar”). The Board found that Oppenheim failed to carry his burden of establishing that he was a person of good moral character. See Rule 15-103(C) NMRA. In his petition, Oppenheim challenges the findings of the Board and the adequacy of the administrative procedures used by the Board in conducting its investigation and hearings; the constitutionality of the good moral character…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re CogginSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- In re MorganSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- New Mexico Board of Dental Health Care v. JaimeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013