Legal Opinion
Siegel v. Committee of Bar Examiners
California Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1973No. S.F. 22957PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Daniel Mark Siegel seeks review of the action of the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar in refusing to certify him to this court for admission and á license to practice law in California. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6066; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 59.)
Petitioner graduated from the School of Law of the University of California at Berkeley in 1970. He took and passed the bar examination given general applicants in August 1970. However, he was not certified to this court for admission because respondent Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar (Committee) was not satisfied…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Robert Underwood, and Supreme Court of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Jacoby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Joseph R. Giannini v. Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.