Legal Opinion
In Re Petition for Admission to the Minnesota State Bar Ex Rel. Haukebo
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1984No. CO-84-718PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Petitioner Craig Haukebo appeals from the decision of the State Board of Law Examiners that the Board has insufficient evidence upon which to recommend him to this court as a person of good moral character for admission to the bar of the State of Minnesota. Based on Haukebo’s record of three convictions of driving while intoxicated between 1979 and 1981, the Board has refused to recommend his admission to the bar unless and until Haukebo provides them with a satisfactory chemical dependency evaluation from a Board-approved agency or successfully completes a treatment program…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Law Students Civil Rights Research Council, Inc. v. WadmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re ManvilleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Application of WiddisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Scott v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In Re ZbiegienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frasher v. West Virginia Board of Law ExaminersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.