Legal Opinion

Wiegand v. Dover Mfg. Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 11, 1923No. Nos. 363, 602PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

These cases have been heard together and submitted for decision upon the same testimony. No. 363 is a patent infringement suit. It charges infringement by the Dover Manufacturing Company of United States letters patent No. 1,133,-*256347, issued March 30, 1915, to Edwin E. Wiegand; No. 1,136,076, issued April 20, 1915, to Edwin E. Wiegand; and No. 1,154,953, issued September 28, 1915, to Edwin E. Wiegand. Cause No. 602 is a suit under section 4915, R. S. (Comp. St. § 9460), to compel the issue of a patent to the plaintiffs for the invention embodied in patent No.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  5. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  2. Papazian v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1957
  3. Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Kuhlke Mach. Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1925
  5. Martin v. Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API