Legal Opinion

Kuhlke Mach. Co. v. Miller Rubber Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 19, 1925No. 1290PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAYER, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit, based on United States letters patent 1,490,468. The patent sued on was issued April 15,1924, to one Otto J. Kuhlke, and by him assigned to the plaintiff. Claims 1, 6, 14, 15, and 18 only are in issue. Defendant’s answer sets up that claims 1, 14, and 15 are now in issue in an interference proceeding in the Patent Office between a pending apjfii cation of Peter De Mattia and Kuhlke’s unexpired patent. This interference was declared after the Kuhlke patent issued, and before this suit was begun. The infringement charge is based on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Computing Scale Co. v. Standard Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Rousso v. BarberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
  4. Craig Demagnetizer & Ink Dryer Corp. v. Static Control Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  5. Wiegand v. Dover Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Morrell & Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Research Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  3. Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  4. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Childers Foods, Inc. v. Rockingham Poultry Marketing Co-op, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API