Legal Opinion
Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is an action brought by Sperry Rand Corporation and its assignors, Eckert and Mauchly, the dissatisfied parties to a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office, for an order under 35 U.S.C. § 146 directing the Commissioner of Patents to issue them a patent. 1
The interference proceeding involved an application for a patent for an electronic computer by the plaintiffs Eckert and Mauchly, Serial No. 757,158, filed on June 26, 1947, and Williams’ application, Serial No. 22784, filed April 28, 1948, a division of an earlier…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pennock v. DialogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Gilbert Shaw and Polymers, Inc. v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Dix-Seal Corporation v. New Haven Trap Rock CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.