Legal Opinion

Martin v. Curtiss Aeroplane & Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 29, 1928No. 3202PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an aetion brought pursuant to the provisions of section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, now title 35, § 63, of the Code of Laws of the United States, in effect December 7, 1925, as amended by Act of March 2,1927, § 11, which reads as follows:

“Sec. 4915. Whenever a patent on application is refused by the Commissioner of Patents, the applicant, unless appeal has been taken from the decision of the board of appeals to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, and such appeal is pending or has been decided, in which case no action may be brought under this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  3. Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  4. In re RobertsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
  5. Twentieth Century Machinery Co. v. Loew Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harper v. ZimmermannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
  2. Riche v. Permutit Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942
  3. Sherman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  4. Longley v. HPC Industrial Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. McGrath v. MontedonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API