Legal Opinion

Moore v. McSleeper

California Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1894No. 15309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order denying a motion for judgment againt sureties upon an indemnifying bond. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

Appeal from an order denying a motion made under section 1055 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have judgment entered in favor of a sheriff, and against sureties named in a bond indemnifying him against liability on account of the execution of a writ of attachment.

The indemnity bond was given in an action brought by one Albert W. Lewis against L. A. Young and others, and recites that said Lewis as principal, and the respondents as sureties, are jointly and severally bound to the *280appellant in this proceeding in the sum of $1,000; and then, after referring to the fact of the delivery to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pieper v. PeersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Evans v. City of American FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Sullivan v. California Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bryan v. BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Barth v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API