Legal Opinion

Barth v. Hall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1931No. Civil No. 2974Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

M. L. Hall, sheriff of Apach'e county, by virtue of a writ of attachment issued in the suit of Isaac Barth v. B. Y. Duke, levied upon a Chevrolet coupé as the property of said Duke. After the levy, one Charley Duke claimed the automobile as his, whereupon the sheriff, as he was authorized to do under section 4248 of the Bevised Code of 1928, required plaintiff in attachment to execute and deliver to him a bond of indemnity. Such indemnifying bond was signed by Isaac Barth as principal and Jacob and Maurice Barth as sureties, and was conditioned to “well and truly indemnify and save harmless…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. McSleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hunter v. DazeArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ives v. SanguinettiArizona Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API