Legal Opinion

Pieper v. Peers

California Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1893No. 14523PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sauta Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

This was an action against the defendants as sureties upon an undertaking given to slay execution of judgment pending appeal. The defendants demurred to the complaint on the ground of insufficiency, and the demurrer was properly overruled. They then answered, and plaintiff had judgment, from which the defendants appeal upon the judgment-roll alone.

It is substantially alleged, and the court finds, that one Marie Albert obtained a judgment in a justice’s court against one Lucas for the delivery of a certain lot of hay, or the value thereof in case delivery cannot be had; that Lucas thereafter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Coburn v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Moffat v. GreenwaltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lucas, Turner & Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Tissot & Wife v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Heine v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Moore v. McSleeperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nelson v. DonovanMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Adler v. StaudeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bolles v. BirdColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API