Legal Opinion
Cy Investment, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 22, 1994No. 91-08-055; CA A76775PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
SAIF Corporation seeks review of an order of the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) 1 determining that 22 dancers at Cy’s Parkrose Pub (Cy’s) are not “workers” and, therefore, are not subject to workers’ compensation coverage. We remand for DIF to apply the “nature of the work” test in determining the dancers’ status.
The material facts are undisputed. Cy’s employs dancers as entertainment for its tavern customers. During the premium period of July 1, 1989, to June 30, 1990, Cy’s identified prospective dancers through advertisements and auditions. Dancers who passed auditions selected…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Great American Insurance v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- S-W Floor Cover Shop v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Castle Homes, Inc. v. WhaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Premsingh & Associates, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Trabosh v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Stamp v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast SalonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- In Re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.