Legal Opinion

Premsingh & Associates, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1992No. 89-05-25; CA A69469PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) that decided that four workers in petitioner’s business are employees and not independent contractors.

Petitioner used the services of four workers between October 1, 1987, and September 30, 1988. It considered them independent contractors and, therefore, did not pay premiums for their workers’ compensation coverage. During a premium audit, SAIF determined that they were subject employees and, after a hearing, DIF agreed. We review the DIF order for errors of law and substantial evidence. ORS 183.482.

The sole…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Castle Homes, Inc. v. WhaiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Strawn v. State Tax CommissionOregon Tax Court · 1962
  4. Strawn v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Salem Decorating Center, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Cy Investment, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API