Legal Opinion
Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast Salon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 25, 1997No. HCH950339; CA A93487PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on a directed verdict against her claims seeking unpaid minimum wages, ORS 653.025, and payment of a statutory penalty for nonpayment of wages, ORS 652.150. We find that plaintiff presented evidence sufficient to warrant submitting both claims to a jury and, consequently, reverse and remand.
Defendant Miller owned and operated the Beauty-N-Beast Salon in Hermiston. The salon was located in a house, and the attached garage contained a tanning bed. Between August and November 1993, plaintiff performed certain services relating to the salon and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Jenkins v. AAA Heating and Cooling, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Cy Investment, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Cejas Commercial Interiors, Inc. v. Torres-LizamaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In re Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Viado v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Cantua v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.