Legal Opinion

Castle Homes, Inc. v. Whaite

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. WCB 86-17464; CA A47482PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

In this proceeding to determine whether Castle Homes is a noncomplying employer under the Workers’ Compensation Act, the question is whether claimant, a mobile home salesperson, was, at the time she was injured, an employe of Castle or an independent contractor. The referee determined that she was an employe and that Castle was a noncomplying employer. Castle seeks review of the determination that it is a noncomplying employer. Claimant cross-petitions, seeking attorney fees. We review pursuant to ORS 183.480 and ORS 183.482. We affirm on both the petition and the cross-petition and write…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Collins v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Carlile v. GreeningerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Edward Slayman v. Fedex Ground Package SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Trabosh v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Salem Decorating Center, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Avanti Press, Inc. v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Cy Investment, Inc. v. National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API