Legal Opinion

Lince v. Monson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1961No. Docket 31, 32, Calendar 48,378, 48,379PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sue defendant doctors for alleged malpractice in their professional treatment of plaintiff wife, hereinafter called the plaintiff. Appeal is from judgments non obstante veredicto for defendants.

On February 14, 1957, defendants performed a right oophorectomy, being the removal of the plaintiff’s right ovary, which had become cystic, and lysis or freeing of certain abdominal adhesions. On May 1, 1957, defendants again performed surgery on the plaintiff for lysis of bowel adhesions and relief of bowel obstruction. They freed adhesions between bowels and the uterus…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Staloch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Zoterell v. ReppMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Delahunt v. FintonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Rodríguez Crespo v. HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
  2. Gass v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Siirila v. BarriosMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Wilson v. StilwillMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dacon v. TransueMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API