Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2016No. CR-16-0348-PRPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Under A.R.S. § 13-1407(E), “[i]t is a defense to a prosecution” for sexual abuse or child molestation “that the defendant was not motivated by a sexual interest.” We hold that lack of such motivation is an affirmative defense that a defendant must prove, and thus the state need not prove as an element of those crimes that a defendant’s conduct was motivated by a sexual interest.

I

¶ 2 We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdicts, State v. Cropper, 205 Ariz. 181, 182 ¶ 2, 68…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. May v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Christopher ArevaloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Claudia Duff v. Hon. lee/tucson PoliceArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. State of Arizona v. Antajuan Stewart Carson Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API