State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles Holle
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VICE CHIEF JUSTICE PELANDER,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 Under A.R.S. § 13-1407(E), “[i]t is a defense to a prosecution” for sexual abuse or child molestation “that the defendant was not motivated by a sexual interest.” We hold that lack of such motivation is an affirmative defense that a defendant must prove, and thus the state need not prove as an element of those crimes that a defendant’s conduct was motivated by a sexual interest.
I
¶ 2 We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to sustaining the jury’s verdicts, State v. Cropper, 205 Ariz. 181, 182 ¶ 2, 68…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- May v. RyanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Christopher ArevaloArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Claudia Duff v. Hon. lee/tucson PoliceArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Antajuan Stewart Carson Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.