Legal Opinion

Sun Cal, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 10, 1990No. 558-85CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDEWELT, Judge.

This government contract action involves a lease and construction contract (No. GSA-9B-82445) originally between the United States General Services Administration (GSA) and C-D Investment Co. (C-D). The contract covers an office building (LAX 7) at 5720 West 98th Street, Los Angeles, California. On October 25, 1984, GSA terminated the contract for default. Plaintiffs, Sun Cal, Inc. (Sun Cal), d/b/a Sun Properties, Inc., and Sun Cal Investments No. 9, Ltd. (SCI 9), which had acquired C-D’s interests in LAX 7, disputed the termination. On March 1, 1985, plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. United States v. GillisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  5. Tuftco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. SIPCO Services & Marine Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. International Fidelity Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. KDH Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API