Legal Opinion

International Fidelity Insurance v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 9, 1992No. 90-521 CPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

TURNER, Judge.

Plaintiff (“IFIC”) is a Miller Act surety that issued bid, payment and performance bonds to the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) on behalf of a prime contractor, Rodeo Construction, Inc., in connection with several construction projects in Texas and Oklahoma. In an amended complaint, IFIC raises four claims, detailed below, arising out of the Postal Service’s response to Rodeo’s deficient performance on these projects. The matter stands on cross-motions for summary judgment.1 Oral argu*471ment was conducted on February 18, 1992. We conclude that summary…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Beta Systems, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Continental Collection & Disposal, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. Transamerica Premier Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API