Legal Opinion

United States v. Gillis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 10, 1877No. 790PublishedCited by 96 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Claims. This suit was brought June 11, 1867, in the court below, by Thomas H. Gillis, in his own name, to récover the proceeds of one hundred and eight bales of cotton seized under the Abandoned and Captured Property Act of .March 12, 1868, as the property $ of John H. Ryan, at Charleston, S. C., in March,. 1865, by the military forces of the United States.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Court of Claims. This suit was brought June 11, 1867, in the court below, by Thomas H. Gillis, in his own name, to récover the proceeds of one hundred and eight bales of cotton seized under the Abandoned and Captured Property Act of .March 12, 1868, as the property $ of John H. Ryan, at Charleston, S. C., in March,. 1865, by the military forces of the United States. The Court of Claims found the following facts: — -1. In March, 1865, one John H. Ryan, of Charleston, S. C., was the owner of one hundred and three bales of upland cotton and five bales of sea-island cotton, which…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strong

The plaintiff seeks to recover in this action the proceeds of the sale of. one hundred and eight' bales of cotton, which, in March, 1865, were the property of John H. Ryan, of Charleston, S. C. During that month the cotton’ was there taken by the military officers of the United • States, as directed' by the Captured and Abandoned Property Act, transported to New York and sold, and the net proceeds of the sale have been covered into the treasury. The. plaintiff, as administratrix of Thomas H. Gilfis, now asserts a right to recover the proceeds by Virtue of. an alleged assignment of the claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Bonner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Ingalls v. ColeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1860
  5. Becker v. SweetzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hobbs v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Freedman's Saving & Trust Co. v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API