Legal Opinion
Sterling Millwrights, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 29, 1992No. 367-88CPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
On July 15, 1983, the United States Department of the Army, acting through the Watervliet Arsenal, in Watervliet, New York, issued the first step in a two-step bidding process for the construction of a chrome-plating facility for the inner surfaces of 120-millimeter M256 cannon barrels mounted on the M1A1 tank. Only plaintiff, Sterling Millwrights, Inc. (Sterling), and a competitor survived the rigorous technical threshold of Step One, Request for Technical Proposals. The contract to be awarded following Step Two was a fixed-price contract let in accordance…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Tyger Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.