Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Sauls
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 18, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–794 (RMC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Edward Richardson, a former employee of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, sues eleven current and former Board employees pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), under which plaintiffs may allege constitutional torts directly against individual federal employees. Mr. Richardson claims that Defendants violated his constitutional rights by taking various improper actions related to his job, personnel records, and complaints of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carr v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Niskey v. NielsenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Perez v. Kipp Dc Supporting CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Ransom v. MayorkasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Votevets Action Fund v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.