Legal Opinion
Coulibaly v. Tillerson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 5, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-0189PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
I.’ INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Dr. Tiemoko Coulibaly, proceeding pro se and. in forma pauperis, brings this action against the United States, the Secretary of State, and eleven other current or former federal employees 2 alleging, among other things, violations of federal statutory law and the First Amendment. In a prior Memorandum Opinion, this Court dismissed or granted summary judgment to Defendants on all but four counts asserted in Dr. Coulibaly’s twenty-two count third amended complaint. See Coulibaly v. Kerry, 213 F.Supp.3d…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Rawlings v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Comm'n on Election IntegrityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Loumiet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Carr v. SessionsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Dunlap v. Presidential Advisory Commission on Election IntegrityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Europe v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.