Legal Opinion
Nevada National Bank of San Francisco v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1907No. Civ. No. 312PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. P. Laird, C. L. Claflin, H. L. Packard, G. W. Zartman, H. V. Kimberlin, and G. H. Smith, amicus curiae, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The judgment or decree from which the appeal has been taken is as follows:
“The alternative writ of mandate issued in this action having been served on defendants and the said defendants having appeared and answered the verified petition of plaintiff and the issues thereby joined having been brought for trial before this court sitting without a jury this 13th day of February, 1905, Messrs. Heller & Powers appearing as attorneys for plaintiff and J. W. P. Laird, Esq., appearing as attorney for defendants and documentary and oral evidence having been introduced and the matter having been argued…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Heine v. Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re Bonds of S. San Joaquin Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Pasadena Junior College District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fletcher v. MapesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945