Legal Opinion

Bolduc v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 25, 2006No. 05-649CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

Plaintiff Frank Bolduc seeks money damages under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1495 and 2513, to compensate him for being unjustly convicted and imprisoned for eight years. The United States has moved for the case to be dismissed as untimely, arguing that Mr. Bolduc filed the complaint six days too late under the applicable six-year statute of limitations period imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2501. For the reasons that follow, the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

In February, 1991, a federal jury found plaintiff and another individual guilty of bank robbery,…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brandt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Chisolm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Lyons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  5. Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API