Legal Opinion
Ensign-Bickford Aerospace & Defense Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 28, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00057PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 U.S.C. § 1498; RCFC 12(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1500; Claim Against the United States or Its Proxy; Pending in Another Court; Cause of Action Aleged; Patent Infringement
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
ELAINE D. KAPLAN, Judge
Plaintiff Ensign-Bickford Aerospace and Defense Company (“Ensign-Bickford”), the owner of two patents directed toward ordnance firing systems, 1 has filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 claiming that Pacific Scientific Energetics Company (“Pacific Scientific”), acting as a subcontractor on a government contract, supplied products to the United States that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Healthestate, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Zaccari v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019