Legal Opinion

Voss v. Stranahan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 75, Calendar No. 34,328PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant Stranahan drove his automobile against plaintiff’s son causing serious injury. Plaintiff recovered judgment for his damages against Stranahan for $1,782.25 and costs. In the trial of that cause defendant Ford was attorney for Stranahan and he may also have been acting for the other defendant, Wolverine Mntnal Motor Insurance Company, a Michigan corporation, a mutual company, as its name indicates, which company had issued to Stranahan a policy in common form, covering the automobile as to fire and theft in named amount, and indemnity against liability for damages for personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bain v. AtkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. Griffin v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Shibler v. HartleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Randall v. Detroit & Northwestern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miholevich v. Mid-West Mutual Auto InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Schudlich v. YankeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Musser v. RicksMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
  5. Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API