Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Rudner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1957No. Docket 39, Calendar 47,051PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Mrs. Stewart, plaintiff herein, had conceived. Though she was a relatively young woman, at least in comparison with her husband, who was 63 .(she was only 37), she was disturbed and apprehensive that she might not be able to have the child. She had had 2 previous stillbirths and she was convinced that she could not normally deliver. As she put it, “I know I couldn’t go through normal.” Yet more than anything else, she testified, she “wanted a sound, healthy baby.”

A solution, however, suggested itself to the couple. They would have the baby delivered by a Caesarean section, * thus avoiding…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Frewen v. PageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Denny v. GaravagliaMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Renihan v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lamm v. ShingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Florence B. Corcoran Wife Of/and Wayne D. Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API