Frederick v. Hillebrand
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Barton, J., presiding. Assumpsit by Walter Frederick against William P. Hillebrand for breach, of a contract to exchange real property. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is an action of assumpsit to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract to exchange or trade certain real estate of the respective parties. The plaintiff, on January 22, 1916, was the owner of a 200-acre farm in the township of Essex, Clinton county. The defendant was engaged in the real estate business in the city of Grand Rapids, and was the owner of certain real estate in that city, and his sisters and brother also owned some real estate *335there, which the defendant was endeavoring to sell or trade for them, with his own property. All of the property involved was mortgaged.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- McKinnon v. McEwanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Clark v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
- Hitchcock v. Supreme Tent of Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Weaver v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Stewart v. RudnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Valentine v. General American Credit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Lawrence v. Will Darrah & Associates, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.