Alderton v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by George A. Alderton against Charles E. Williams and Lafayette C. Williams upon promissory notes. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Carpenter J.
Thisais the second time this suit has been before us. Our first decision will be found reported in 130 Mich. 626.
Plaintiff sues to recover $5,000, which he claims to have advanced as surety for defendants in payment of six notes on which he and defendants were the joint makers. After the former judgment was reversed in this court, defend*298ants elected to waive the benefit of their plea of the general issue, admitted the facts alleged in plaintiff’s declaration, and relied upon the facts stated in an accompanying notice for their defense. Those facts may be briefly stated as follows:…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Harrow Spring Co. v. Whipple Harrow Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Raymond v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Wesleyan Seminary v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Sample v. RomineMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
- Keiswetter v. RubensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Denny v. GuytonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Hathaway v. Porter Royalty Pool, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Tompkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.