Legal Opinion

Sears v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 8, 2017No. 12-889L and 13-404L (Consolidated)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Post-trial determination of the just compensation due in a rails-to-trails case; value of the agricultural land taken for trail use; cost to reclaim; severance damages attributable to “point rows;” no preemption of Iowa statute guaranteeing access to fields otherwise landlocked by the trail

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

This post-trial opinion addresses claims by a subclass of plaintiffs who own sixteen parcels attendant to the right-of-way of a railroad line formerly operated by the Iowa River Railroad in Hardin and Marshall Counties, Iowa, that has been converted into a recreational trail…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. DON PERRY v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF HULL & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
  2. BEDWELL v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  3. Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API