Sears v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Post-trial determination of the just compensation due in a rails-to-trails case; value of the agricultural land taken for trail use; cost to reclaim; severance damages attributable to “point rows;” no preemption of Iowa statute guaranteeing access to fields otherwise landlocked by the trail
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This post-trial opinion addresses claims by a subclass of plaintiffs who own sixteen parcels attendant to the right-of-way of a railroad line formerly operated by the Iowa River Railroad in Hardin and Marshall Counties, Iowa, that has been converted into a recreational trail…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DON PERRY v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF HULL & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
- BEDWELL v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Balagna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.