Bates v. Gerber
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Mandamus to compel the respondent, as treasurer of the city of Sacramento, to pay interest on overdue coupons of certain bonds of said city.
The court below sustained the demurrer to the complaint, and rendered judgment for the defendant thereon. The plaintiff appeals.
The precise question presented here was decided adversely to the appellant in Davis v. Porter, 66 Cal. 658. On the authority of that case the judgment of the court below must be affirmed, not alone because it has been so decided by this court, but because it was correctly decided, for the reasons stated in the opinion.
In this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Davis v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by11 opinions
- Meyer v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- McPherson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Heath v. Green City Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Irvine v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.