Legal Opinion
Fogg v. Wakelee
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 9, 1983No. File 05084PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
James P. Doherty, State Trial Referee.
The plaintiffs instituted this action pursuant to the provisions of § 47-34 of the General Statutes seeking the appointment of a committee to establish the location of a lost boundary between land owned by the plaintiffs and land owned by the defendant in the town of Shelton.
The defendant filed an answer denying that the boundary was lost or was uncertain and also filed a cross complaint charging the plaintiffs with trespass on his land and with slandering his title to the land he owns by causing maps and subdivision plans to be recorded on the land…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Phillips v. BonadiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Missionary Society v. CoutuSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Barrs v. ZukowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Faiola v. FaiolaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Fogg v. WakeleeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Garcia v. Itt Hartford Insurance Company, No. Cv 98-0579974 (Dec. 8, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Barbie H. Drazen 1988 Trust v. Sullivan, No. 29 05 86 (Mar. 15, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
- Marrin v. Spearow, No. Cv 90-0052928 (Apr. 15, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993