Legal Opinion
Fogg v. Wakelee
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 21, 1985No. 12224PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is an action to establish the
boundary between two adjacent properties in Shelton. The state trial referee, sitting as the trial court, fixed *288the boundary in accordance with the claims of the plaintiffs, Leonard F. Fogg III and Rudolph Gajdosik, Jr. The defendant, D. Morgan Wakelee, has appealed from the judgment of the trial court.
The only issue that has been properly briefed is whether there was sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision to fix the disputed boundary in accordance with a survey map prepared by Clarke & Pearson Associates.1 The trial court relied on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Aetna Life & Casualty v. Miscione of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Fogg v. WakeleeConnecticut Superior Court · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gorra Realty, Inc. v. JetmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Zimny v. Cooper-Jarrett, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- State v. HahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Loeb v. Al-Mor Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Mattie & O'Brien Contracting Co. v. Rizzo Construction Pool Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011