Legal Opinion
State v. Hahn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 24, 1988No. 13324PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether improper notarization of an incomplete mortgage deed constitutes forgery in the second degree, as defined by General Statutes § 53a-139 (a) (l),1 in light of an information charging the defendant with false completion of a mortgage deed. The state alleged that the defendant, Ray David Hahn, with intent to defraud, deceive or injure Peter T. Dallicker, Martha H. Dallicker and Gerda Larras, had falsely completed their mortgage deed to the Dartmouth Plan, Inc. (Dartmouth Plan), by having added his name as notary and having falsely acknowledged that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. FrankoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Secrest v. SECURITY NATIONAL MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2002-2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. LynchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.