Legal Opinion
Barrs v. Zukowski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 8, 1961PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs sought an injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing on the plaintiffs’ land. They also asked for damages. The defendants, in their answer, denied that the plaintiffs were the owners and in possession of the land which was in dispute. The court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The case arose out of a dispute over a boundary line. The finding, with certain corrections to which the plaintiffs are entitled, recites the following facts: In 1936, Arthur H. Keeney conveyed to Edna Copp lots 13, 14 and 15 as shown on a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. SciortinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Padula v. PadulaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Huntington v. WhaleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Shea v. GavittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wadsworth Realty Co. v. SundbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Robinson v. MyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Marquis v. DrostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Wildwood Associates, Ltd. v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Velsmid v. NelsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.