Legal Opinion

Senn v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1988No. USDC 84-1250-FR USCA 86-3682 SC S34097, USDC 85-1852-FR USCA 86-3802 SC S34097PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

We have accepted certification of two questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to resolve certain issues of tort liability under Oregon law. The questions certified to us are these: (1) Under Oregon law, if the plaintiff in a products liability action shows that two defendant drug manufacturers each produced a drug either defectively designed or defective because of failure to warn of risks inherent in the use of the drug but cannot show which manufacturer produced the drug plaintiff received, does the burden of proof shift from plaintiff to defendants to show…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Collins v. Eli Lilly & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Norwest v. Presbyterian Intercommunity HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Shackil v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. Adams v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Prather v. Abbot LaboratoriesDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013
  5. Allen v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API