Legal Opinion

Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1990No. 67732, 67747 consPublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

The plaintiff in this appeal alleges that she was injured by the drug diethylstilbestrol (DES), which her mother ingested during pregnancy. She seeks relief against defendant DES manufacturers. The issue is whether, in a negligence and strict liability cause of action, Illinois should substitute for the element of causation in fact a theory of market share liability when identification of the manufacturer of the drug that injured the plaintiff is not possible. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to various counts of the complaint, including a negligence count,…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Colbert v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API