Legal Opinion

Adams v. GD Searle & Co., Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 18, 1991No. 89-02843PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

576 So.2d 728 (1991)

Scott and Denise ADAMS, Appellants,

v.

G.D. SEARLE & CO., INC., Appellee.

No. 89-02843.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 18, 1991.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1991.

Michael D. Eriksen of Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth, Romano, Eriksen & Kupfer, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

A. Broaddus Livingston and Alan C. Sundberg of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PATTERSON, Judge.

Scott and Denise Adams brought a product liability action against G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., the manufacturer of Denise's intrauterine…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Felix v. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. McKee v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hall v. Sunjoy Industries Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  3. Bailey v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  4. In re Baycol Products LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
  5. Tillman v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API