Legal Opinion

Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 31, 1989PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

This is a medical-malpractice and products-liability action arising out of the 1972 inoculation of the infant plaintiff with a combined diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine, commonly known as DPT vaccine. Despite extensive discovery, plaintiffs were unable to identify the manufacturer of the DPT vaccine administered to the infant plaintiff. The issue is whether, in the context of childhood vaccinations, New Jersey should substitute for the element of causation-in-fact a theory of “market share” liability, thereby shifting to defendant…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rowe v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  3. Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Zaza v. Marquess and Nell, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Ppg Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API