Legal Opinion

Doreus v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 2009No. 06-CF-247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant, Gad Doreus, guilty of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute (cocaine) while armed.1 He challenges his conviction on the ground that the trial court violated (1) his constitutional Sixth Amendment confrontation right by admitting the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) chemist’s report over his objection and without ordering the government to make the chemist available for cross-examination, and (2) his constitutional Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights by denying his motion to suppress physical and identification…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Peterkin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Tobias v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. BullardHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Doreus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API