Legal Opinion

Thomas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 2006No. 03-CF-1125PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees the accused in a criminal prosecution the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him. The Confrontation Clause makes no exception for expert witnesses. In this appeal from a conviction for distributing cocaine, we hold that the Clause was violated when the prosecution introduced a Drug Enforcement Administration chemist’s written expert testimony against appellant without calling the chemist to appear and testify in person.

The chemist’s written statement was offered in evidence at appellant’s trial…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. People v. RawlinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Hinojos-Mendoza v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Comford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API