Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2009No. 06-CF-1586, 06-CF-1587PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Senior Judge:

A jury found both appellants guilty of distributing cocaine to an undercover police officer. On appeal, them primary argument (indeed, Williams’ sole contention) is that the admission of a DEA-7 chemist’s report identifying the recovered substance as cocaine, without corresponding testimony by the chemist, violated Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), as applied in Howard v. United States, 929 A.2d 839 (D.C.2007), and Thomas v. United States, 914 A.2d 1 (D.C.2006). The government concedes error on the point but argues that Williams…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jerome Bradley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Barrows v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Duvall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. Bruce.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API