Legal Opinion

Washington v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2009No. 05-CF-487PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Eric R. Washington was tried and convicted on charges of distribution of a controlled substance (cocaine) and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (cocaine) (“PWID”). His convictions must be reversed because the trial court admitted a Drug Enforcement Administration chemist’s substance analysis (“DEA-7”) reports, and refused to allow appellant to cross-examine the chemist in person, despite the government’s failure to furnish copies of the DEA-7 reports to appellant in advance of trial as required by D.C.Code § 48-905.06 (2001). These…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Robles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. In Re DwDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. In re D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Washington v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API