Legal Opinion

Peterkin v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1971No. 5610, 5615PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge:

Appellants were convicted of possession of desoxyn tablets in violation of D.C.Code 1967, § 33-702(a) (4). 1 On this appeal admission of the drug into evidence is challenged as the fruit of an unlawful search. It is contended that the police lacked probable cause to arrest appellants thereby rendering the incident search unlawful and that, short of probable cause, there was no justification under the rationale of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) to conduct a protective search for weapons. Careful consideration has led us to the conclusion that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Rhinelda M. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. DuPont v. Crummer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Albert D. Dorsey v. United States of America, Paul T. Wright, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Patrick H. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Duhart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Tobias v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. People v. BallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API