Legal Opinion
Beckanstin v. Liquor Control Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 21, 1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The liquor control commission suspended for forty-five days the wholesaler’s liquor permit on which the plaintiff was the permittee and the Eastern Liquor Company, Inc., was the baeker. The suspension was based upon three violations of § 4306 of the General Statutes 1 and three violations of § 151-19 of the regulations promulgated by the commission. 1 Upon appeal the Court of Common Pleas rendered judgment sustaining the commission and from that judgment this appeal has been taken.
From the evidence before it, the commissionmight reasonably have found the following facts: In the summer and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Barnes v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- Carroll v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Francis v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Riley v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- State v. HanusiakConnecticut Appellate Court · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.