Legal Opinion
State v. Heinz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1984No. 11930PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether affidavits accompanying an application for a warrant for arrest established probable cause to arrest the defendant on a charge of promoting an obscene performance. The defendant, Curtiss Heinz, was charged with four counts of promoting an obscene performance in violation of General Statutes § 53a-194, the first two counts relating to events that occurred on December 19,1979, and the latter two counts relating to events that occurred on January 9,1980. After a trial to a jury, the defendant was convicted on all four counts. The Appellate Session of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State v. BartonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. RodgersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.