Legal Opinion

Riley v. Liquor Control Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 9, 1965PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

On April 23, 1963, the plaintiff William J. Riley applied to the defendant for a permit to conduct a liquor package store in Enfield. On June 3, 1963, the plaintiff Harry F. Preston made a similar application for a package store liquor permit in Norwalk. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, henceforth called the company, was the backer on each application. Section 30-48a of the General Statutes was passed by the 1963 General Assembly and became effective on June 24, 1963. The text of the section is printed in the footnote. In July, 1963, the defendant refused to accept, and returned,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bania v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. McGee v. DunniganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Karen v. Town of East HaddamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Stapleton v. LombardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Atwood v. Regional School District No. 15Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Kelman v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Connecticut State Employees Ass'n v. Connecticut Personnel Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API