Legal Opinion
Baloch v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 13, 2005No. CIV.A.03-1207(RMU)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
GrantiNG In Part the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting the • Plaintiff Leave To Amend
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Mohammad S. Bal-och, brings suit against the Department of the Interior pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e(16), and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., for discrimination, hostile work…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nurriddin v. GoldinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Runkle v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Smith v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.