Legal Opinion
Runkle v. Gonzales
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2005No. Civil Action 04-0714 (RMU)PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss. 1 The defendants urge the court to dismiss each of the plaintiffs eight counts in his amended complaint for either a failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or for lack of subject jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). For the reasons discussed in this memorandum opinion, the court grants the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Rattigan v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Agee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Robinson-Reeder v. Am. Council on Educ.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Edwards v. AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bowe-Connor v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.